Showing posts with label warfare. Show all posts
Showing posts with label warfare. Show all posts

Thursday 23 November 2017

SunTzu Strategy six – Element of Surprise






Sun Tzu Strategy six – Element of Surprise













In warfare surprise can be achieved by deception as well as by the troop’s speed and mobility. Also, what is termed “noise” refers to false moves. Make noise in the East and attack in the West, or make noise there and attack here, so that the enemy cannot decide where to put its guard. Thus we can attack the place where the enemy has no defense. The enemy’s command becomes confused and unrestrained; it can then be subdued when discipline is in disarray or lost. 








The principal goes, “Against a good attacker, the enemy does not know where to defend.” For a successful attack, attack the place the enemy does not defend; for successful defense, defendant a place the enemy does not attack. 







As it is, there can never be too much deception in war. However here some caution is warranted, for one has to be ascertained of the enemy’s lack of judgment before making such false moves to deceive it. 







A good commander with presence of mind knows his strong and weak points and arrays his troops accordingly; he is therefore not liable to be misled by the enemy’s false gestures. He can even pretend to be deceived and turn the enemy’s trick against it. Therefore when one tries to deceive the enemy, one must bear in mind the deceitfulness of the enemy. 







Thus Sun Tzu observes, “In the past, those who were good at marshaling warfare first made sure that they could not be defeated and then waited for an opportunity to defeat the enemy.” 







Fin

Monday 3 July 2017

Kill the Chicken to Scare the Monkey

Kill the Chicken to Scare the Monkey


Compared with the chicken, the monkey is much more difficult to kill, but it can be scared into submission by the killing of the chicken.

A military commander can scare two kinds of people into submission: his own troops or power groups without formal allegiance.

In the latter case, he must have an advantage over the people he wants to frighten. For instance, when a leader of an alliance of bandit groups wants to bring the various group leaders into total submission, he can pick out the most powerful of those groups and destroy it completely. He will not choose to destroy all of them, partly because they are useful to him, but mainly because it is beyond his capacity to fight with all of the at once.

The strategy may also be used to strengthen military discipline, when the commander severely punishes someone whose high connections make him irreverent of military rules and defiant of the commander.

When fighting with the enemy, our soldiers will advance and dare not back up if they are more afraid of us then the enemy. If they dare back up but not advance, that is because they’re afraid of the enemy but not of us.

Authority and rigor compel the soldiers to go through fire and water without disobedience. The principal goes, “when severity surpasses solicitude, victory is certain.” In warfare, make our soldiers dare advance but not retreat when encountering the enemy. Those who retreat for a single step must be severely punished. In this way, victory can be achieved.

The principal goes, “use execution to prohibit fear. When fear is excessive, refrain from execution but treat the troops kindly and inform them of the way of survival.” There will be a victory in the soldiers are more afraid of their commander then the enemy, and defeat if soldiers are more afraid of the enemy than of their commander.

The way to predict victory or defeat is to compare the soldiers’ fear for the commander and for the enemy.

















Fin